Subject: Snacks (not to be eaten) Mon 24 Sep 2018, 17:42
Hi there, I am translating a book about medieval history and cannot find an English definition for "snacks" —less so a Spanish equivalence…
This is the sentence wher the problem arises:
"The ships are alternatively called cogs (a single-masted sailing ship with a flat bottom made from heavy timbers) or snacks (an esnecca, a long galley with oars and a sail".
I wish anyone could help me with this naval term —maybe the medieval term esnecca would help.
Thanks a lot for your sure help, as you have always done.
CM
Meles meles Censura
Posts : 5121 Join date : 2011-12-30 Location : Pyrénées-Orientales, France
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Mon 24 Sep 2018, 20:57
Are you sure the word isn't smack, with an 'm'? A smack is still used in English for a small sailing vessel, with one or at most two masts, typically used in coastal trade or for near-shore fishing. The word is generally said to originate from the Low German 'schmacke' or the Dutch 'smak', both meaning simply a small ship.
However in the 12th century contemporary documents* do indeed refer to the ship that the Angevin kings habitually used to shuttle back and forth between their realms in England and France - the royal yacht as it were - as an 'esnecca'. This is, I'm fairly sure, simply a latinised form of the Old English word 'sneca or 'snaca', meaning a snake/serpent. Accordingly I wonder if the term didn't arise somewhat as a mirror of the Norse, 'drakkar' ie dragon, which was the common name for their sleek longships ... only with esnecca/snake denoting something just a little bit smaller.
*Under Henry I and Henry II the post of 'nauclerus' (ie 'boat-captain') of the royal 'snecca' is recorded as being paid '12d per diem' - ie 12 pennies/a shilling a day: so quite a good wage when a typical labourer earned a penny a day and even a skilled artisan could only expect at most sixpence a day.
Nielsen Triumviratus Rei Publicae Constituendae
Posts : 595 Join date : 2011-12-31 Location : Denmark
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Tue 25 Sep 2018, 02:05
Have a look here, ComicMonster, and perhaps have a look at the parallel article in other languages - https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snekke
MM, according to this article the word does indeed seem to be related to Old English 'sneca' or 'snaca'.
Meles meles Censura
Posts : 5121 Join date : 2011-12-30 Location : Pyrénées-Orientales, France
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Tue 25 Sep 2018, 07:54
'The Oxford Companion to Ships and the Sea', for esnecca, gives this:
"A long galley or longship, propelled by oar or sail, used by Scandinavian seamen as a warship probably between the 5th and 11th centuries. It is generally described as having twenty rowing benches, but occasionally up to 30 were fitted. The Scandinavian meaning of the word was snake, probably in reference to its extra length in comparison with the normal longship. No illustration of an esnecca is known to exist though it has been suggested that the ship incorporated in the seal of the city of Monmouth may be one.
Later, the word was used in England to describe a vessel belonging personally to the king in which he made voyages of state. Both Henry I and Henry II are recorded as having esneccas during the 12th century, the equivalent of a royal yacht."
ComicMonster Consulatus
Posts : 197 Join date : 2017-10-24
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Tue 25 Sep 2018, 08:26
Hi Meles meles, glad to know from you :-)
Your explanations are simply astonishing, and you were most probably right when you first suggested it could be "smack, with an 'm'". Looking that word in the English Wikipedia, you get the description of a small boat, that translates, according to the Spanish one, to "sumaca", which sounds pretty convincing to me.
I really appreciate your help in all those matters. I find it amazing.
All the best,
CM
Meles meles Censura
Posts : 5121 Join date : 2011-12-30 Location : Pyrénées-Orientales, France
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Tue 25 Sep 2018, 08:57
Glad to be of help.
By the way here's the seal of the City of Monmouth which as mentioned above is thought to depict a medieval esnecca:
... although it doesn't look particularly 'snake-like' and to my inexpert eye it looks very much like any other contemporary depiction of a ship from about the 12th to 14th centuries.
Last edited by Meles meles on Tue 25 Sep 2018, 09:10; edited 1 time in total
LadyinRetirement Censura
Posts : 3327 Join date : 2013-09-16 Location : North-West Midlands, England
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Tue 25 Sep 2018, 09:09
I don't think I can be of help to ComicMonster but my late mother came from beside the sea in north Wales. She had family that gained their living from the sea both from fishing and also some aunts and uncles who were stewards on ocean going vessels. However I remember her asserting that the term "b*mboy"** could be used as somebody's job on a ship or boat and not simply in a pejorative way about a gay man. I know there were "bumboats" - small boats that ferried items from shore to larger vessels off shore.
**Does anybody know what the job was - and I hope I haven't come across as precious by my use of an asterisk.
ComicMonster are you translating from Latin? I wish I had worked harder at Latin now. I think I said somewhere on the hallowed pages of Res Hist that I just about scraped a pass at O level - I had to do the unseen because I hadn't studied the set books attentively enough. I don't know if nowadays The Aeniad or Caesar's Gallic Wars Book V would hold more interest if I revisited them but my 15-16 year old self yawned.
ComicMonster Consulatus
Posts : 197 Join date : 2017-10-24
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Tue 25 Sep 2018, 09:17
Hi, LadyinRetirement; no, I am translating from English, it's just that sometimes there are captions or terms written in latin —which I also studied eons ago, and wasn't very good at neither. On the other hand, I really think you may find ejoyable texts and infos you thought boring some time ago. That's at least what has happened to me with history in general, which, well written, is just great, but was a mere (and horrible) collection of dates and kings to skip when in my teens.
Kind regards,
CM
Meles meles Censura
Posts : 5121 Join date : 2011-12-30 Location : Pyrénées-Orientales, France
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Tue 25 Sep 2018, 09:26
Would not a bumboy be just a bumboat boy? So performing a function like 'Little Buttercup' who is described as 'A Bumboat Woman' in Gilbert and Sullivan's operetta, 'HMS Pinafore':
So someone supplying, to quote Winston Churchill, "rum, bum and baccy", though not generally the bum bit. (That is actually a misquote as Churchill in fact described Royal Naval service as "all rum, sodomy and the lash", but the snappier "rum, bum and baccy", has become the most repeated one).
LadyinRetirement Censura
Posts : 3327 Join date : 2013-09-16 Location : North-West Midlands, England
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Tue 25 Sep 2018, 11:16
MM may be right about the above - usually the simple explanations are the most likely though those who like a fanciful conspiracy theory tend to disagree.
CM, yes the texts may seem more interesting now (though I'd probably cheat and read them in English translation). I know my late mother said Caesar's books irritated her when she came across "Caesar hostes imperavit" - thought he was throwing his weight about and demanding hostages. Of course, I knew that "hostes" was enemies and "obsides" was hostages - still probably in the original Caesar was probably demanding that the enemy give him hostages.
PaulRyckier Censura
Posts : 4902 Join date : 2012-01-01 Location : Belgium
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Tue 25 Sep 2018, 22:22
Meles meles wrote:
Glad to be of help.
By the way here's the seal of the City of Monmouth which as mentioned above is thought to depict a medieval esnecca:
... although it doesn't look particularly 'snake-like' and to my inexpert eye it looks very much like any other contemporary depiction of a ship from about the 12th to 14th centuries.
Posts : 4902 Join date : 2012-01-01 Location : Belgium
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Tue 25 Sep 2018, 23:27
Meles meles wrote:
Glad to be of help.
By the way here's the seal of the City of Monmouth which as mentioned above is thought to depict a medieval esnecca:
... although it doesn't look particularly 'snake-like' and to my inexpert eye it looks very much like any other contemporary depiction of a ship from about the 12th to 14th centuries.
Meles meles,
I don't kwow what happened now. I had a link incorporated, which said it wasn't allowed to use or something like that, about "viking snekke boats in Oslo" if you type it in google you will see it. And suddenly my message didn't appear anymore and only the URL of that page was shown and I couldn't do anyting anymore...had to close my computer and reopen... That said I try again without the link:
Posts : 5121 Join date : 2011-12-30 Location : Pyrénées-Orientales, France
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Wed 26 Sep 2018, 09:10
Indeed Paul, although I think there were some subtle differences between the various types of medieval ship. A kogge (cog in English) was flat-bottomed while another type of vessel, similar to the cog but with a round bottom, was called a 'hulk'. It is fairly definitely known what a hulk looked like by the ancient borough seal of the town of New Shoreham in Sussex (where I was born). The town was at one time sometimes known as 'Hulkesmouth' and around the edge of the seal (dating from 1295) is written "hoc hulci vigno vocor o's sic domini digno" - "By this sign of a hulc (hulk) I am called its Mouth which is a worthy name". A hulk therefore would seem to have had a strongly curved shape, a round bottom but no keel:
A Mediterranean development of the cog was the carrack (or nef in French), which was a larger vessel with a deeper rounded hull, 2 or even 3 masts, and was carvel-built (hull plunks were butted against each other) rather than clinker-built (hull plunks overlapping) which was how cogs and earlier Northern European longships were constructed. A carvel built hull was stronger allowing carracks to be larger and able to support more masts, and it was this sort of ship that was capable of carrying Columbus and his contemporaries all the way to the Americas or round Africa to India and the Far East.
A carrack as depicted by Pieter Bruegel the Elder circa 1558:
PaulRyckier Censura
Posts : 4902 Join date : 2012-01-01 Location : Belgium
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Wed 26 Sep 2018, 21:39
Will add an addendum about Piet Hein steeling the silver from the galleons of the Spanish silverfleet sailing from America...hmm confiscating for the noble sake during the Dutch revolt against Philip II
Kind regards from Paul.
PaulRyckier Censura
Posts : 4902 Join date : 2012-01-01 Location : Belgium
Subject: Re: Snacks (not to be eaten) Wed 26 Sep 2018, 22:26
And although we were in the time at the Spanish side in the Dutch revolt of the United Provinces, we had the song in our song curriculum in a Belgian school of the Fifties, but to be fair we had also South-African "Afrikaans" songs in our curriculum as "Mijn Sarie Mareis" I am a bit like LiR, perhaps worser... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarie_Marais
And due to the wiki it was also sung on the British side in English...
And now I see for the first time in my life that it can come from an American civil war song: