Just a few, rather random, throughts:
In the Islamic medical system, honey is considered a healthy drink and its therapeutic use is even mentioned in the Qur'an: "And thy Lord taught the bee to build its cells in hills, on trees, and in (men’s) habitations; Then to eat of all the produce (of the earth), and find with skill the spacious paths of its Lord: there issues from within their bodies a drink of varying colors, wherein is healing for men: verily in this is a sign for those who give thought". In medieval Arabic medicine, honey seems to have been used mostly for internal ailments: diarrhea, coughs, tuberculosis etc, although I seem to remember the Iranian physician, Avicenna, aka Ibn Sina (980-1037), alongside other treatments recommended honey as one of best treatments for wounds. Of course he and other Arabic scientists may well have got their information direct from ancient Greek texts. They certainly seem to have inherited the GraecoRoman principles of medicine as espoused by the Roman physician Galen (129–c. 200), by way of the exiled Nestorians, who translated Galen into Syriac when they found sanctuary in Sassanid city of Jundi Shapur and from whence this knowledge travelled throughout the Islamic Empire when the city was taken by a Muslim Arab army in 636.
In 'Epitome' by the Byzantine physician Paulus Aegineta (625-690), which is his summary of Galen's and other early medical writers' works, honey is certainly mentioned for the treatment of wounds, alongside numerous other substances: he thought cooked honey, powdered chalk, vinegar, wine, myrrh, frankincense and egg-white were all good as astringents; while to cleanse wounds he recommended raw honey, pine resin, turpentine and radish (and also rather less plausibly, lizard dung and pigeon blood).
The renaissance physician Ambroise Paré (1510–1590), who in Europe was one of the first to question Galen's principles, also used emollients made of honey, egg yolk, turpentine, or raw onion for wounds (particulaly for the 'dirty' wounds that were increasing being seen on battlefields due to the development of guns and artillery) as a gentler and more effective treatment than the then standard practice of 'sealing' wounds by cautery with hot irons or with boiling tar. (But again that's from memory and I can't find reference).
I also seem to remember that during WW1 the Russian army resorted to using honey on battlefield injuries when standard medicines (antiseptics only, as antibiotics wouldn't be discovered for a few decades to come) were unobtainable because of supply problems.