A discussion forum for history enthusiasts everywhere
 
HomeHome  Recent ActivityRecent Activity  Latest imagesLatest images  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  SearchSearch  

Share | 
 

 Aren't medieval knights just improper fighters?

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
Gduj15662
Quaestor
Gduj15662

Posts : 20
Join date : 2024-02-08

Aren't medieval knights just improper fighters? Empty
PostSubject: Aren't medieval knights just improper fighters?   Aren't medieval knights just improper fighters? EmptyFri 29 Mar 2024, 10:10

How come people think that medieval knights such as the Teutonic Knights are decent warriors when medieval knights such as the Teutonic Knights were actually very weak?


The Battle of Grunwald proves that medieval knights were weaklings who had weak stupid military training. The Battle of Grunwald was a battle in which the Teutonic Knights were decisively defeated by a Polish-Lithuanian alliance despite the Polish-Lithuanian alliance being extremely outnumbered by the Teutonic Knights.


Many people say that at the Battle of Grunwald, there were pro-Polish-Lithuanian alliance heavy cavalry knights on the Polish-Lithuanian side but based on facts, reasoning, and common sense, there weren't any. Knights being on the Polish-Lithuanian side never played important roles in the Polish-Lithuanian victory of the battle because those pro-Polish-Lithuanian alliance knights never existed. In fact, there weren't even any type of heavy cavalry on the Polish-Lithuanian side. In fact, there weren't even any cavalry on the Polish-Lithuanian side. Yet the Teutonic Knights still lost the battle which is embarrassing.


Also, in the war between the Teutonic Knights and the Polish-Lithuanian alliance, there were only 2 battles(which the Battle of Grunwald was one of) and the Teutonic Knights lost all of them. In that other battle besides the Battle of Grunwald, the Teutonic also lost despite extremely outnumbering the Polish-Lithuanian alliance and despite the fact that the Polish-Lithuanian alliance never had heavy cavalry knights in that other battle besides the Battle of Grunwald.

Another battle that proves that medieval knights were weaklings was the Battle of the Ice which took place in Russia between the Teutonic Knights and some Russians. The Russians just steamrolled the Teutonic Knights in the Battle of the Ice without any difficulty or losses whatsoever despite being extremely outnumbered by the Teutonic Knights. This proves that the Teutonic Knights are again just amateurs with no proper military training or even martial arts training.



And by the way, the Templar Knights never won battles against Mamluk slave warriors or even killed members of the Mamluk slave warrior class despite the Mamluk warrior class always being extremely outnumbered while the Mamluk slave warrior class always destroyed medieval knights.



So why do people think that medieval knights were decent fighters when they clearly aren't?
Back to top Go down
 

Aren't medieval knights just improper fighters?

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

 Similar topics

-
» The medieval european christians are fools for using the knights against the Ottoman empire
» Did the Mamluk warriors prove that the medieval western European knights are weaklings?
» Knights V Snails!
» Medieval Skyscrapers
» Medieval arrowhead

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Res Historica History Forum :: The history of people ... :: War and Conflict-