A discussion forum for history enthusiasts everywhere
 
HomeHome  Recent ActivityRecent Activity  Latest imagesLatest images  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  SearchSearch  

Share | 
 

 Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European...

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
PaulRyckier
Censura
PaulRyckier

Posts : 4902
Join date : 2012-01-01
Location : Belgium

Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European... Empty
PostSubject: Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European...   Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European... EmptySat 25 Aug 2012, 22:08

Saw this on the BBC today. Seems that the common Indo-European language originated perhaps in the region of the nowadays modern Turkey...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19368988

Kind regards, Paul.
Back to top Go down
Islanddawn
Censura
Islanddawn

Posts : 2163
Join date : 2012-01-05
Location : Greece

Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European... Empty
PostSubject: Re: Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European...   Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European... EmptySun 26 Aug 2012, 05:45

There is another article on this new theory here too Paul.

http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1112681461/language-model-vocabulary-082412/
Back to top Go down
nordmann
Nobiles BarbariƦ
nordmann

Posts : 7223
Join date : 2011-12-25

Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European... Empty
PostSubject: Re: Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European...   Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European... EmptySun 26 Aug 2012, 11:28

A phylogenetic analysis will be just as speculative and inconclusive as any other method if the analyser weights cognitives (as has been done here), using a selective and by definition subjective method to isolate the cognitives concerned. In semantics this approach would almost be deemed heretical in that there is a huge assumption being made regarding the solidity of meaning which, in that discipline, is the very first thing one has to jettison before one can even take up the study.

What I really don't like about the way these linguistic theories are presented, and in fact even the naming conventions used, is the other huge assumption of a primal base from which later languages (also given geographical or quasi-geographical names) then emerge and split. Linguistic evolution of course involves diversification and regional attachment, but it also entails other very important characteristics such as invention, extinction, near extinction followed by re-ignition, and most importantly assimilation and utilisation by people not always travelling westwards! I have no doubt that many of the cognitives can indeed be traced back to Anatolia (this is not a new theory by any means), just as they can with an equal degree of certitude be traced back to the Steppes. This is only an apparently contradictory set of claims if one is hideboundedly devoted to a rather linear and uncomplicated model of human expansion. If on the other hand one is open to the apparent evidence presented anthropologically that human interaction and movement often defies general assumption, then one is obliged to afford the same latitude to the development and movement of the languages they spoke.

I assume the New Zealand researchers won't care too much either if their bald assertion of conclusivity is rejected by their peers in any case. It appears to me that the whole thing is a rather poorly disguised attempt to promote phylogenetic analysis as applicable in disciplines outside of the study of viral transmission for which it was developed programatically. Like other methods of analysis so completely dependent on computer-generated modelling (climate change has been an obvious recent example), the golden rule in assessing its worth - often despite the claims of its practitioners - is to question the validity of the selection of the data which was inputted to generate the model concerned.

In this case (as is indeed so often the case) the answer to this question reveals, it appears yet again, major flaws in terms of objectivity. There is an old-style piece of computer jargon which applies here and has always applied in processes dependent on artificial calculation - GIGO.

Garbage In, Garbage Out.
Back to top Go down
https://reshistorica.forumotion.com
PaulRyckier
Censura
PaulRyckier

Posts : 4902
Join date : 2012-01-01
Location : Belgium

Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European... Empty
PostSubject: Re: Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European...   Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European... EmptySun 26 Aug 2012, 19:35

Thank you Islanddawn for your parallel input.

Thank you also Nordmann for the more "realistic" approach, which we are used to from you during the years that we know each other. Approach which is always welcome, when some sudden theories are started.

Kind regards and with esteem to both,

Paul.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European... Empty
PostSubject: Re: Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European...   Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European... Empty

Back to top Go down
 

Some new theory about the origin of Indo-European...

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

 Similar topics

-
» Origin of Place Names
» Hennins - what is their origin?
» Thoughts on Darwinian Theory
» Origin of languages and their evolution
» Origin Dollar sign

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Res Historica History Forum :: The history of expression ... :: Language-